rafer: marco: These two remotes, by Apple (left, Apple TV) and Microsoft (right, Xbox 360), do approximately the same things with a few exceptions: The Microsoft remote uses two AA batteries that need to be replaced about every 6 months. The Apple remote uses a single CR2032 that has never needed to be replaced. The Apple remote has 6 buttons. The Microsoft remote has 46, only 15 of which are regularly used for media playback. The buttons on the Microsoft remote are backlit so you can see what they do in the dark. The Apple remote doesn’t have this feature because you never need to look at the buttons after the first minute of use. The Apple remote works from nearly any position in the room with approximate line-of-sight between itself and the front of the Apple TV. The Microsoft remote has the worst reception angle of any remote I’ve ever used (supposedly 90°, ±45°). Mine starts failing consistently at about 22° right of center at a distance of 8 feet, putting it right at the bottom of their specified total radius (~44°). It won’t even work from the right half of the couch. This is a pretty good indicator of the two companies’ design philosophies and quality goals. And this isn’t even considering the software interface that each remote is respectively controlling.
View Separately

rafer:

marco:

These two remotes, by Apple (left, Apple TV) and Microsoft (right, Xbox 360), do approximately the same things with a few exceptions:

  • The Microsoft remote uses two AA batteries that need to be replaced about every 6 months. The Apple remote uses a single CR2032 that has never needed to be replaced.
  • The Apple remote has 6 buttons. The Microsoft remote has 46, only 15 of which are regularly used for media playback.
  • The buttons on the Microsoft remote are backlit so you can see what they do in the dark. The Apple remote doesn’t have this feature because you never need to look at the buttons after the first minute of use.
  • The Apple remote works from nearly any position in the room with approximate line-of-sight between itself and the front of the Apple TV. The Microsoft remote has the worst reception angle of any remote I’ve ever used (supposedly 90°, ±45°). Mine starts failing consistently at about 22° right of center at a distance of 8 feet, putting it right at the bottom of their specified total radius (~44°). It won’t even work from the right half of the couch.

This is a pretty good indicator of the two companies’ design philosophies and quality goals. And this isn’t even considering the software interface that each remote is respectively controlling.

Source: marco

189 Notes/ Hide

  1. meklejulaimi reblogged this from iamsosorry and added:
    tl;dr Macs rule PCs drool.
  2. nicolasprieto reblogged this from marco and added:
    * Muy parecido al control de DirecTV no?
  3. qliu reblogged this from marco
  4. imkevinxu reblogged this from kevin
  5. kter reblogged this from kahoni
  6. kahoni reblogged this from tsupo
  7. nobtakanukui reblogged this from wayayaya
  8. yositest reblogged this from wayayaya
  9. tajimaya reblogged this from hageatama
  10. tsupo reblogged this from saitamazihen
  11. saitamazihen reblogged this from hageatama
  12. hageatama reblogged this from grahamgrafx
  13. museumstudies reblogged this from lenier and added:
    When easier is better… Thumbs up!
  14. yoconyan reblogged this from hide-gbuc
  15. cyclingandsuch reblogged this from iamsosorry
  16. fillup reblogged this from hellaposer
  17. iamsosorry reblogged this from bradofarrell
  18. etecoo reblogged this from takaug
  19. takaug reblogged this from captkevman
  20. nknh reblogged this from captkevman
  21. geospiza reblogged this from kevin
  22. okne reblogged this from grahamgrafx
  23. woody reblogged this from marco and added:
    photoshop contest, but actually...exceptionally similiar products. Life immitating art